he balanced the budget, improve the efficiency of the government, he was reelected by 60%. if walker is right, that this is needed to save money for the government, which could then be used in other areas, spare laos, etc., and the economy is strong, he will win. all of this depends now on whether the proposition he laid out about the union's crippling government and making it impossible to carry out its work rationally and within a budget, is right or not, and we will see. >> there is a sea change difference between mitch daniels and walker. i know mitch daniels. he did not galvanize the opposition the way that walker did. he went out of his way to do that. he tried to make a strong political statement on behalf of individuality. ok, he became the poster boy.